Issues abound. How do we convey that the scalars are small so a implementation of a modular image can be efficient in that case?
|
Public Methods |
| | ImageField () |
| | ImageField (Hom< Source, Target > nat) |
| | ImageField (Source &S, Target &T) |
| Elt & | image (Elt &t, const SrcElt &s) |
| SrcElt & | preimage (SrcElt &s, const Elt &t) |
| Elt & | smul (Elt &y, const SrcElt &a, const Elt &x) |
| | y <-- a*x
|
| Elt & | smulin (Elt &x, const SrcElt &a) |
| | x <-- a*x
|
| Elt & | saxpy (Elt &z, const SrcElt &a, const Elt &x, const Elt &y) |
| | z <-- a*x + y
|
| Elt & | saxpyin (Elt &y, const SrcElt &a, const Elt &x) |
| | y <-- a*x + y
|
Protected Types |
| typedef Target::Element | Elt |
| typedef Source::Element | SrcElt |
Protected Attributes |
| Hom< Source, Target > | _nat |