The Supreme Court Case on Java Versus C++
Roles
CISC 470/670 - Programming Languages
Fall 2000
Court Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2000
Legal Team Organization:
Java Legal Team:
- Alban: Lawyer in charge of opening statement
- Robert: Lawyer in charge of closing statement
- Thongchai: Witness interrogator for own team's witness on readability/writability
- Du Wei: Witness interrogator for own team's witness on reliability
- Rui: Witness interrogator for own team's witness on performance
- Andrew: Witness interrogator for own team's witness on usability
- Stacey: Witness interrogator for opposing team's witness on readability/writability
- Matt Spilich: Witness interrogator for opposing team's witness on reliability
- Tim: Witness interrogator for opposing team's witness on performance/usability
- Mike Zhu: Witness expert on readability and writability
- Ilknur:Witness expert on reliability
- Eric: Witness expert on performance
- Uty: Witness expert on other usability
C++ Legal Team:
- Sonny: Lawyer in charge of opening statement
- Abe: Lawyer in charge of closing statement
- Joe Pellegrino: Witness interrogator for own team's witness on readability/writability
- Ty: Witness interrogator for own team's witness on reliability
- Don: Witness interrogator for own team's witness on performance
- Joe Squyres: Witness interrogator for own team's witness on usability
- Matt Huenerfauth: Witness interrogator for opposing team's witness on readability/writability
- Frank: Witness interrogator for opposing team's witness on reliability
- Masha: Witness interrogator for opposing team's witness on performance/usability
- Chris Haase: Witness expert on readability and writability
- Bill: Witness expert on reliability
- Tara: Witness expert on performance
- Greg: Witness expert on other usability
See court case briefing for details on collaboration and responsibilities.
Last Change: November 7, 2000 /
pollock@cis.udel.edu