Names of Poster Developers:

Instructions for providing high quality feedback: This feedback should provide constructive, succinct feedback of the poster. Please complete this form and include comments that justify your rankings for each aspect and will help the poster developers with their presentation skills.

Aspect	Metric	Circle your ranking and include justification
Content - technical material that was presented	1-mostly content-free 2-reasonable, average level and amount of content - could have more detail, less extraneous information 3-good, above average coverage and level of detail with little extraneous information, missing some aspects of project 4-excellent, learned alot about the project from the poster
Organization - Flow between topics/panels	1-couldn't follow the flow, got lost often 2-reasonable, average, but some issues with flow between panels 3-good, above average flow, with minor issues 4-excellent, one of the best organized posters
Presentation - poster design, understandability and appeal	1-need a lot more color, pictures, or design 2-reasonable, average design, but some distracting items or lacking some design elements 3-very good above average, minor design/presentation problems 4-truly exceptional, an excellent presentation - design really caught my interest
Overall Quality	1-needed a lot more work 2-reasonable, average 3-very good, above average 4-truly exceptional, excellent representative poster

For the following questions, please keep in mind justification for your rankings above.

1. What was the best aspect of this poster?

2. What could be improved?

Write your name at the very bottom of this form, to be cut off before giving to poster developers.