Answer:
Usually the branch delay slot is filled with a nop instruction.
This does nothing.
Usually the branch delay slot is filled with a nop instruction.
This does nothing.
jal Instruction
It would not be a disaster to return control to an instruction that does nothing. But sometimes programmers or compilers put something clever in the branch delay slot, so it is best not to pass control to it.
The diagram shows the execution of a jal instruction.
The jal is at address 0x00400014.
The return address is 0x0040001C which is the
address of the jal plus eight.
(The addu instruction there is just used as an example
of what might be at the return address).
Return from the subroutine to the caller is done with
a jr instruction. This will be discussed
in a few pages.
H ere
is how the jal instruction works in general:
jal sub # $ra <― PC+4 (the address 8 bytes away from the jal)
# PC <― sub load the PC with the subroutine entry point
# a branch delay slot follows this instruction
Here is how it works in this example.
The entry point of sub is 0x00400100.
Fetch: When the jal is fetched the PC has 0x00400014.
Increment: The PC is incremented to 0x00400018.
Execute: $ra <― 0x004001C = 0x0040018+4
PC <― 0x00400100
The nop instruction in the
branch delay slot is executed.
Then execution continues with the first instruction
of the subroutine at 0x00400100.
Control has been passed to the subroutine and
the return address is in $ra.
The subroutine has the return address is in $ra.
Can an ordinary jump instruction be used to return to the caller?